ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Value-driven attentional capture prevents commission errors in real time.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Failures of sustained attention are pervasive in everyday life. In the lab, these states of attention can be tracked unobtrusively using response times (RTs) in monotonous, continuous performance tasks requiring frequent responses. Here, we used a RT-based real-time triggering procedure to investigate the interplay between fluctuations of attentional state and another attentional phenomenon: experience-dependent capture. We investigated predictions from two related accounts. One proposes attentional lapses could reduce one's ability to suppress capture by the distractor (capture-suppression account). The other proposes capture could "snap" attention back into focus (perceptual-recoupling account). Participants first completed a training task that differentiated colored targets by reward and then performed a sustained attention task that required they execute visual search on each trial. On rare trials, the colors relevant during training served as distractors inserted during lapsing and focused states. The results aligned with predictions from the perceptual-recoupling account: Experiment 1 showed that both novel and reward-associated distractors enhanced accuracy, whereas Experiment 2 showed a moderation of the reward-driven effect during fast-triggered moments. Pooled analyses confirmed a reliable reward-driven reduction in errors that diminished over successive blocks and was most pronounced early on for participants with stronger color-reward associations during fast-triggered trials. This study shows the potential of using experience-dependent capture to mitigate performance decrements associated with lapsing attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42209891What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.