SynthesisEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Efficacy of treatment for subacromial pain in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE recommendations.
Synthesis in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subacromial pain is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition that impairs shoulder function, particularly in older adults. It is often associated with tendinopathy, bursitis, and biomechanical dysfunction, leading to limitations in daily activities and decreased quality of life. Despite its clinical relevance, studies targeting individuals aged 60 years and older are scarce. The aim of this review was to systematically synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of conservative treatments for subacromial pain in adults aged 60 years and older.
methodsThis review followed the Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024591488). Six databases were searched without restrictions. Eligible RCTs compared therapeutic interventions to minimal intervention controls and reported outcomes on pain and/or disability. Risk of bias was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models.
resultsOut of 6,198 records, four RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Interventions included resistance training, cycle ergometer exercise, dry needling, and osteopathic manipulative treatment. The meta-analysis of three trials showed a statistically significant pooled effect for pain reduction (MD = -1.60; 95% CI: -3.16 to -0.04); however, two studies (resistance training and cycle ergometer) demonstrated significant individual benefits. The overall certainty of evidence ranged from low to high. No study assessed disability using validated upper limb-specific instruments.
conclusionsAlthough some interventions demonstrated positive effects on pain, the overall evidence for conservative treatments in older adults with subacromial pain is limited. Further high-quality trials are needed, focusing on functional outcomes and long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.