ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Learning curve of totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in early-career surgeons: a dual analysis using CUSUM and moving average.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is increasingly performed, but most learning curve studies involved senior surgeons with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) experience. Evidence is lacking for early-career surgeons transitioning directly from open surgery to robotics. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve of RPD using dual analytic methods and to explore efficiency gains through sub-phase analysis of operative time.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 78 consecutive RPD performed by a single early-career surgeon (May 2023-August 2025). Learning curves were assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) and five-case moving average analyses of operative time. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared across phases. In addition, operative time was subdivided into docking, resection, and anastomosis to evaluate phase-specific efficiency gains.
resultsCUSUM identified proficiency at case 23, and moving average showed stabilization at case 41, delineating three phases: initial learning (1-22), proficiency (23-41), and stabilization (42-78). Mean operative time decreased significantly across phases (523.6 → 309.3 min; p < 0.001). Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula declined from 31.8 to 5.4% (p = 0.012). Conversion to open surgery was 3.8%. Sub-phase analysis demonstrated that most reductions were attributable to shorter resection and docking times, while anastomosis time remained stable. Oncologic adequacy was preserved (mean lymph nodes 18.6, R0 resection 97.4%). No 90-day mortality occurred.
conclusionIn this single-surgeon series, operative proficiency appeared after approximately 23 cases and stabilized after 41 cases. Dual analytic methods revealed complementary insights into the learning curve, and sub-phase analysis highlighted that efficiency gains were primarily achieved in resection and docking. RPD may represent a feasible training pathway for early-career surgeons in structured high-volume environments with appropriate mentorship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42209858What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.