ArticleScientific reports2026
CAHA-Net: A novel MR image classification model based on DenseNet incorporating coordinate attention and hybrid augmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional diagnostic approaches are time-consuming and labor-intensive, and the field currently lacks a comprehensive evaluation of mainstream models that addresses their complementary strengths. Computer-aided diagnosis methods can significantly increase the accuracy and efficiency of MRI-based image classification, thereby providing useful support for brain tumor computer-aided diagnosis research. To address these challenges, this study utilizes a brain tumor MRI dataset comprising 4,264 images from 333 subjects to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of various mainstream Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformers under a repeated patient-level validation protocol. In addition, representative Transformer models are further evaluated under a pretrained partial fine-tuning setting. The results reveal that DenseNet-121 provides a favorable balance between diagnostic performance and computational efficiency under the no-external-pretraining setting, whereas pretrained Transformer models remain competitive when external visual pretraining is available. Building upon these findings, we propose CAHA-Net (Coordinate Attention and Hybrid Augmentation Enhanced DenseNet), an improved architecture based on DenseNet-121. This method employs a hybrid augmentation strategy combining Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization and FMix, aiming to enhance local contrast and increase tumor-background variation during training. Furthermore, by integrating a Coordinate Attention mechanism, the model simultaneously captures spatial positional information in both the horizontal and vertical directions, promoting more lesion-sensitive feature representations during classification. The experimental results demonstrate that CAHA-Net achieves the best average performance among the tested ablation variants in multi-class classification tasks, achieving a Macro-F1 score of 94.14% ± 1.16%, an AUC of 98.97% ± 0.48%, and a false positive rate as low as 1.66% ± 0.39%. The systematic ablation results indicate that FMix is the main independent contributor to performance improvement, whereas coordinate attention helps stabilize feature representation within the complete augmentation-attention pipeline. The proposed model provides preliminary evidence of robustness and cross-dataset transferability, offering an efficient and useful reference for computer-aided diagnostic research on brain tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.