ArticleScientific reports2026
Dynamic path optimization and multi-objective decision-making for photovoltaic tracking systems using deep reinforcement learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the core challenge of synergistically optimizing power generation efficiency, equipment wear, and environmental adaptability in photovoltaic (PV) tracking systems under dynamic conditions, this study proposes a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based intelligent optimization framework. A 37-dimensional state-space multi-objective decision process model is constructed, integrating spatiotemporal solar irradiance, PV panel status, environmental parameters, and historical decisions. An entropy-weighted multi-objective reward function balances conflicting objectives, while an improved Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (CDDPG) algorithm, incorporating periodic decay learning rate, prioritized experience replay, and parallel training, resolves traditional issues of convergence oscillation, trade-off imbalance, and poor real-time performance. Validated via a dual-axis tracking platform using 2024 full-year field data from Xiaojin County, Sichuan, results show about 12.3% average efficiency gain vs. PID, Q-learning, and original DDPG, 18.7% lower equipment wear with 0.08 mm gear wear after 6 months, decision latency <8ms and 3.2% performance degradation under ± 5% noise, and 2.1% 6-month generation decay with 3.5% cross-season decay. This framework enables intelligent PV tracking upgrades with enhanced efficiency, reduced costs, and improved stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.