ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Predicting progression-free survival in glioblastoma with neuroimaging and machine learning.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent and aggressive form of malignant glioma. Reliable estimation of progression-free survival (PFS) prior to medical intervention could strengthen clinical decision-making and improve patient care. Here, we utilize machine learning (ML) to predict PFS in GBM patients using resting state network (RSN) connectivity before medical intervention.
methodsGBM patients (N = 45, mean age 62.1 ± 10.3 years, mean PFS 9.5 ± 5.6 months, 62.2% male) were retrospectively recruited from Washington University Medical Center. All patients completed structural neuroimaging and resting-state functional MRI before surgery. Deep neural networks were trained on resting-state functional connectivity to predict PFS. Feature selection identified the 15 strongest predictive features prior to training.
resultsSex (p = 0.0037), overall survival (p = 0.0003), MGMT promoter methylation status (p = 0.0064), presentation of weakness (p = 0.0037), and presentation of memory impairment (p = 0.045) were significantly associated with PFS. Tumor frequency and spatial correlation analyses associated dorsal attention, visual, frontal-parietal, and default mode networks with shorter PFS. Conversely, right-temporal lobe tumors were associated with better outcomes. RSN spatial maps revealed widespread alterations in association networks in GBM patients relative to controls. MRMR feature selection identified thalamic and association network connectivity, including somatomotor, ventral and dorsal attention, and default mode/parietal memory as the strongest predictors of PFS. Using leave-one-out validation, the model predicted PFS with an RMSE of 1.26 months, MAE of 1.08 months, and R² of 0.96 (p < 0.001).
conclusionsOur findings indicate that GBM alters functional brain organization on a widespread scale, and these global effects are informative of patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.