ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Predict neuromuscular performance in human epidural electrical stimulation: phase 1 trial interim results.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04969042 (Efficacy of Closed-loop Functional Spinal Cord Stimulation on Walking Rehabilitation in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Closed-loop Functional Spinal Cord Stimulation on Walking Rehabilitation in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidural electrical stimulation (EES) has emerged as a promising therapy for restoring motor function in patients with paralysis. A primary challenge in this therapy lies in identifying feasible stimulation parameters in huge selection space for different movements, given the limited understanding of the precise alignment between stimulation and corresponding neuromuscular performance. We aimed to develop a computational framework that predicts neuromuscular performance under EES and thereby reduces the need for extensive in-clinic parameter searches.
methodsWe implanted purpose-designed 32-contact epidural interfaces in two individuals with motor-complete spinal cord injury and reconstructed personalized spinal anatomies from medical imaging. Finite element simulations and axonal recruitment modeling were integrated with machine learning to establish a predictive mapping between stimulation parameters and muscle responses. A dimensionality-reduction Bayesian optimization algorithm was subsequently applied to identify compact sets of stimulation parameters targeting specific motor objectives, and selected configurations were validated through clinical testing. This study is an interim report of an ongoing registered clinical trial (Closed-loop Functional Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04969042), sponsored by Beijing PINS Medical Co., Ltd.
resultsHere we present purpose-designed 32-contact epidural neural interfaces that enabled two individuals with spinal cord injury to regain lower-limb motor function. The hybrid predictive model demonstrated strong quantitative agreement with experimentally measured muscle responses (mean squared error = 0.0096). Algorithm-guided parameter recommendations comprising 180 configurations outperformed both the historical dataset (1,602 configurations) and conventional bipolar settings across four functional objectives. Clinical validation further confirmed that the recorded muscle activations were in close agreement with model predictions.
conclusionsThe AI-aided computational framework can serve as a reliable and feasible agent for evaluating and recommending effective EES parameters. By bridging anatomical modeling with functional outcomes, this approach offers a practical pathway toward optimizing neuromodulation therapies and advancing the development of personalized treatment strategies for individuals with spinal cord injury.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.