ArticleScientific reports2026
A Bioactive PLGA-modified SIS scaffold loaded with astragaloside IV-preconditioned BMSCs promotes infected wound healing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infected wounds present a significant clinical challenge due to persistent inflammation, bacterial infection, and hindered tissue regeneration. In this study, we developed a composite bioactive scaffold by combining PLGA-modified small intestinal submucosa (SIS) with astragaloside IV (AS-IV)-preconditioned bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). We evaluated its physicochemical characteristics and therapeutic effectiveness both in vitro and in a infected wound model. The composite scaffold exhibited enhanced mechanical strength and facilitated the adhesion and proliferation of the BMSCs. Pretreatment with AS-IV significantly enhanced BMSC survival and boosted the secretion of pro-regenerative factors such as VEGF and TGF-β, potentially contributing to the observed enhanced regenerative effects in this study. In vivo, the PABS group exhibited markedly accelerated wound closure compared to the control groups, along with reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells and increased collagen deposition (~ 50%) and epidermal thickness (~ 154 μm). Furthermore, enhanced angiogenesis and controlled expression of inflammatory cytokines (reduced TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6; increased IL-10) were observed, suggesting a potentially improved modulation of the wound microenvironment. This multifunctional scaffold facilitated wound healing by combining antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and pro-regenerative effects, offering a promising approach for managing chronic and infected wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.