ArticleScientific reports2026
Hydrodynamic investigation of acoustic bubble-surface interactions on nanoarray-coated fins for microelectronic cooling with machine learning-based analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine-Learning-Driven Performance Optimization of Nano-Modified Construction Materials: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a novel phase-change cooling strategy that synergistically integrates acoustofluidic bubble dynamics with nanoarray-coated micropin fins to enhance thermal performance. A multidisciplinary framework combines experimental measurements-heat transfer coefficient (HTC), heat flux, velocity fields, and pressure drop-across SS, S30-120, and S-nanosheet architectures with machine-learning models, including LASSO, Random Forest, and Deep Neural Networks. Statistical correlation analyses (Spearman rank and Kendall tau) and interpretability techniques (SHAP, Partial Dependence Plots, Symbolic Metamodeling, Double Machine Learning, and TCAV) provide both predictive accuracy and physical insight. Nanosheet-coated surfaces deliver substantial performance gains, achieving a 71.2% increase in critical heat flux and a 160.9% improvement in HTC compared with smooth surfaces, validated by a highly accurate DNN model (R² = 0.99, MAE = 0.01). SHAP analysis identifies heat flux as the dominant factor governing bubble dynamics, while nanoarrays enhance nucleation and optimize pressure drop to improve efficiency. Symbolic Metamodeling and Double Machine Learning confirm heat flux as the primary driver of heat transfer, with secondary contributions from velocity, which influences bubble residence time, and nanoarray density. Feature-importance results further show that S-nanorod structures and pressure drop strongly regulate nucleation and flow behavior, whereas microreactor parameters have minimal influence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.