ArticleScientific reports2026
The current status and future directions of short video dissemination on urolithiasis via the TikTok platform: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urolithiasis is a common and highly recurrent urological disorder. With the growing role of short video platforms in health communication, Douyin (TikTok) has become an important medium for public medical education. However, the quality and user engagement characteristics of urolithiasis-related content remain insufficiently evaluated. This study aimed to assess the content quality and user engagement of urolithiasis-related videos on TikTok and to explore how video source, content theme, and presentation style are associated with educational value and audience response. A total of 400 Chinese-language TikTok videos across five stone types, including renal, ureteral, bladder, urethral, and urinary tract stones, were analyzed. Content quality was evaluated using four validated instruments, namely the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) instrument, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). User engagement metrics included likes, comments, shares, and saves. Statistical analyses were conducted to examine variations in quality and engagement across source, content, and presentation form. Overall content quality was low (mean JAMA 1.23; GQS 2.84; mDISCERN 3.09). Videos focusing on prevention and recurrence demonstrated higher PEMAT understandability and actionability scores and were associated with greater user engagement. Hospital- and news agency-based videos showed higher content quality; however, lower engagement was primarily observed in hospital-based videos. Animation and image-text formats were associated with improved understandability. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)-themed videos, although less frequent, demonstrated relatively high actionability and user engagement. The quality and communication effectiveness of urolithiasis-related videos on TikTok varied substantially. Prevention-oriented content, culturally relevant framing, and visually supported formats were associated with improved user engagement and understanding. Integrating evidence-based information with platform-adaptive design may enhance the effectiveness of digital health communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.