ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2026
A gender-sensitized lifestyle intervention powered by sport fandom in men with overweight or obesity: a 1-year cost-effectiveness analysis of the Hockey FIT Trial.
Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesTo describe the program-related costs and estimate the cost-effectiveness of Hockey Fans In Training (Hockey FIT), a gender-sensitized lifestyle intervention, over a 1-year period. SUBJECTS/
methodsWe conducted a pragmatic, cluster randomized trial among men aged 35-65 years with a body mass index ≥27 kg/m
resultsThere were 657 participants included in this analysis (360 control; 297 Hockey FIT). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The total intervention cost was $6832.20 CAD per site or $341.61 CAD per participant. The total mean cost for participants in the Hockey FIT group over the 12-month study period were slightly greater than the control group from the healthcare payer perspective (mean difference = $72.94 CAD; 95% CI: $531.17-$677.06, corresponding to a percentage difference of +7.4%) and from the societal perspective (mean difference = $395.31 CAD; 95% CI: -$1247.40-$2038.02, percentage difference of +13.2%), however differences were not statistically significant. Participants in the Hockey FIT group had significantly greater weight loss at 12 months compared to the control group (mean difference = 1.51 kg (95% CI: -2.42- -0.59) resulting in an incremental cost of $48.30 CAD per kilogram weight loss from the healthcare payer perspective, and $261.79 CAD per kilogram weight loss from the societal perspective. There were no significant differences in quality adjusted life years, resulting in incremental ratios of $36,470 CAD/QALY gained (payer) and $197,655 CAD/QALY (societal).
conclusionA lifestyle intervention that engaged men through the power of sport fandom (Hockey FIT) resulted in greater weight loss, with minimal additional costs, and no significant differences in healthcare resource use over one year in middle-aged men with overweight or obesity.
Identifiers
42209661What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.