ArticleScientific reports2026
Biosurveillance and early outbreak detection of rabies in settings with limited laboratory capacity using spatiotemporal clustering and a machine learning framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rabies is an important but often neglected zoonotic disease with significant public health, veterinary, and economic impacts. Inadequate surveillance and diagnostic resources in low- and middle-income countries impede its effective public health responses. This study demonstrates the use of an extreme gradient boosting (XGB) technique for animal rabies risk assessment in endemic areas of Haiti with limited diagnostic resources. We employed spatiotemporal clustering and trend analysis techniques to assess rabies status across large geographic areas. The XGB model achieved high specificity (0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99), sensitivity (0.78, 95% CI: 0.61-0.95), negative predictive value (1.0, 95% CI: 0.99-1.00), and accuracy (0.98, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99) in predicting animal rabies cases. The framework identified 20 high-risk rabies clusters, representing a 40% increase in detected transmission zones compared to laboratory-confirmed data alone. This included 8 clusters in underserved communities where no diagnostic infrastructure was previously available, enabling real-time monitoring of disease and surveillance trends in previously unmonitored regions. Trend analysis facilitated real-time monitoring of high-risk clusters with significantly changing disease and surveillance statuses. This study showcases a data-driven, evidence-based framework for neglected and emerging zoonotic disease surveillance in economically constrained regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.