ArticleScientific reports2026
A weld point cloud recognition method based on an improved Light Gradient Boosting Machine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate weld-region identification is essential for weld quality inspection and automated grinding. However, weld point clouds are highly irregular and lack explicit topological structure, which makes accurate recognition challenging. To address this issue, this study formulates weld point-cloud recognition as a binary point-wise classification task. Each point is classified as either weld bead or base metal. A systematic classification framework is established by combining neighborhood-based geometric feature extraction, baseline model comparison, and metaheuristic hyperparameter optimization. Three morphology-specific weld subsets, including straight-line, curved-line, and S-shaped welds, are used for evaluation. The classification performance of Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) is first compared under different neighborhood scales. Overall Accuracy (OA), Precision, Recall, and F1-Score are used as evaluation metrics. The results show that LightGBM achieves the best baseline performance at a neighborhood radius of 1.5 mm. To further improve classification performance, LightGBM hyperparameters are optimized using metaheuristic algorithms. The compared optimizers include the Artificial Lemming Algorithm (ALA), Alpha Evolution Algorithm (AE), and Starfish Optimization Algorithm (SFOA). Repeated-run results demonstrate that AE-LightGBM achieves the most favorable overall performance under the unified evaluation protocol. Statistical significance analysis and convergence analysis further support the effectiveness of AE among the compared optimizers. In addition, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) is employed to analyze feature contributions and improve the interpretability of the optimized model. The proposed method provides an effective technical pathway for robot-based weld recognition and grinding tasks using 3D vision and supervised machine learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.