Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42209617›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A weld point cloud recognition method based on an improved Light Gradient Boosting Machine.

Hongtao Yang, Ziqiang Bi, Xiulan Li, Qingan Yao, Peng Zhang, Haotian Bai, Yunlong Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongtao YangSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China.
Ziqiang BiSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China.
Xiulan LiSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China. dearxiulan@126.com.
Qingan YaoCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China.
Peng ZhangEngineering Technology Department, Tianjin CPC Keyuan Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd, Tianjin, 300280, China.
Haotian BaiSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China.
Yunlong ChengSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China.

Funding

the Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Development Program 20240404055ZP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate weld-region identification is essential for weld quality inspection and automated grinding. However, weld point clouds are highly irregular and lack explicit topological structure, which makes accurate recognition challenging. To address this issue, this study formulates weld point-cloud recognition as a binary point-wise classification task. Each point is classified as either weld bead or base metal. A systematic classification framework is established by combining neighborhood-based geometric feature extraction, baseline model comparison, and metaheuristic hyperparameter optimization. Three morphology-specific weld subsets, including straight-line, curved-line, and S-shaped welds, are used for evaluation. The classification performance of Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) is first compared under different neighborhood scales. Overall Accuracy (OA), Precision, Recall, and F1-Score are used as evaluation metrics. The results show that LightGBM achieves the best baseline performance at a neighborhood radius of 1.5 mm. To further improve classification performance, LightGBM hyperparameters are optimized using metaheuristic algorithms. The compared optimizers include the Artificial Lemming Algorithm (ALA), Alpha Evolution Algorithm (AE), and Starfish Optimization Algorithm (SFOA). Repeated-run results demonstrate that AE-LightGBM achieves the most favorable overall performance under the unified evaluation protocol. Statistical significance analysis and convergence analysis further support the effectiveness of AE among the compared optimizers. In addition, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) is employed to analyze feature contributions and improve the interpretability of the optimized model. The proposed method provides an effective technical pathway for robot-based weld recognition and grinding tasks using 3D vision and supervised machine learning.

Indexed as

3D visionExplainable artificial intelligenceLightGBMMetaheuristic optimizationPoint cloud processingWeld recognition

Identifiers

PMID42209617
PMCPMC13392363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.