ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantum-inspired optimization of transformer-capsule networks for accurate brain tumor segmentation and classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumors represent one of the deadliest types of neurological diseases, a fact that makes early accurate diagnosis essential for the survival of patients. Tumor analysis based on deep learning, as it is currently done, has three main problems: the segmentation step fails to adequately model the long-range spatial dependencies, the classification pipelines have the problem of feature redundancy, and there is no modeling of the structural relationship between the featuresall of these factors together make the diagnosis less reliable. This work proposes a novel Quantum-Inspired Optimization of Transformer-Capsule Networks (QI-TCN) framework that jointly addresses these limitations. The framework integrates: (i) a Swin Transformer U-Net (Swin-UNet) for hierarchical segmentation; (ii) Quantum-Inspired Harris Hawks Optimization (QHHO) for both segmentation hyperparameter tuning and discriminative feature selection; (iii) EfficientNetV2 for compact high-capacity feature extraction; and (iv) a Graph Attention Capsule Network (GACN) for spatially-aware tumor classification. Evaluated on the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 benchmarks, the proposed framework achieves classification accuracies of 99.02% and 99.15%, F1-scores of 98.97% and 99.10%, Dice-WT scores of 97.4% and 97.4%, and AUC values of 99.3% and 99.4%, respectivelysurpassing all compared baselines. All improvements are statistically significant (paired t-test, t = 12.84, p < 0.001) across 5 independent runs. Cross-dataset evaluation on the Figshare Brain Tumor Dataset yields 96.8% zero-shot accuracy and 98.4% after 10-epoch fine-tuning. These results demonstrate that the proposed framework offers a robust, interpretable, and clinically viable solution for automated brain tumor diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.