ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploring anticancer drug structures through vertex based resolving parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The generation of molecular descriptors with structural information remains a major challenge in quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) studies. We introduce a new class of vertex-based topological indices based on the idea of resolving degrees stemming from metric dimension theory in chemical graph theory. In contrast to classical degree-based descriptors, the introduced indices consider vertex resolvability information, thus increasing their capacity to separate structurally similar molecular graphs. These descriptors were calculated for several anticancer drugs and correlated with spatially significant physicochemical properties, namely, boiling point, molar volume, enthalpy of vaporization, flash point, and molar refractivity. The predictive performance of the linear and cubic regression models was considered. The analysis revealed statistically significant and robust correlations between the proposed indices and all the studied properties. Although linear models present interpretable relationships, unlike cubic regression models that prioritize accuracy over interpretability, the underlying nonlinear structural effects are better represented in cubic regressions, which can consistently achieve the best accuracy. The results indicate that resolving-degree-based descriptors are more predictive of structure than their qualifying counterparts, making these new topological metrics promising candidates for the QSPR modeling framework as well as in computational drug design and cheminformatics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.