Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42209593›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Development and evaluation of an effective solubility prediction model for pharmaceuticals in organic solvents using machine learning based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting.

Masood Valavi, Mehdi Assareh, Ali Khoshsima, Michael Svärd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masood ValaviThermodynamics Research Laboratory, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi AssarehThermodynamics Research Laboratory, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Ali KhoshsimaFaculty of Petroleum and Chemical Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran.
Michael SvärdDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. micsva@kth.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we have examined the predictive capability of a machine leaning model based on the XGBoost framework as regards the solubility of active pharmaceutical ingredient-like molecules in organic solvents over a wide range of temperatures. A total of 30 binary mixtures has been investigated. The dataset was divided in two sets, with one set for training, testing and validation including solubility data for four solute compounds (butyl paraben, fenofibrate, risperidone, fenoxycarb) consisting of a total of 224 data points, and the second set used for prediction consisting of the solubility data for butamben, with 50 data points in total. The calculated root mean square errors (RMSLE) for the calculated solubility (train, test, validation) were 0.05, 0.09, 0.13 and 0.15, respectively, while the average RMSLE for the predicted solubility of butamben was 0.41. A total of 10 descriptors were considered in this work, comprising parameters for solute (heat of fusion, melting temperature, heat capacity and Hansen solubility parameter), two descriptors representing the solvent (dielectric constant and boiling temperature) as well as temperature, and drug and solvent names. The temperature-dependence of solubility has been captured accurately by setting a constraint on the XGBoost algorithm. A comparison between the performance of the machine learning model proposed and evaluated in this work, and the semi-predictive Flory-Huggins and the temperature-dependent NRTL-SAC models on the other hand, shows that for all the studied compounds, the machine learning model can deliver significantly improved capability to model as well as predict solubility.

Indexed as

Machine learningPharmaceuticalsSolubility predictionTemperature

Identifiers

PMID42209593
PMCPMC13219517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.