ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and evaluation of an effective solubility prediction model for pharmaceuticals in organic solvents using machine learning based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we have examined the predictive capability of a machine leaning model based on the XGBoost framework as regards the solubility of active pharmaceutical ingredient-like molecules in organic solvents over a wide range of temperatures. A total of 30 binary mixtures has been investigated. The dataset was divided in two sets, with one set for training, testing and validation including solubility data for four solute compounds (butyl paraben, fenofibrate, risperidone, fenoxycarb) consisting of a total of 224 data points, and the second set used for prediction consisting of the solubility data for butamben, with 50 data points in total. The calculated root mean square errors (RMSLE) for the calculated solubility (train, test, validation) were 0.05, 0.09, 0.13 and 0.15, respectively, while the average RMSLE for the predicted solubility of butamben was 0.41. A total of 10 descriptors were considered in this work, comprising parameters for solute (heat of fusion, melting temperature, heat capacity and Hansen solubility parameter), two descriptors representing the solvent (dielectric constant and boiling temperature) as well as temperature, and drug and solvent names. The temperature-dependence of solubility has been captured accurately by setting a constraint on the XGBoost algorithm. A comparison between the performance of the machine learning model proposed and evaluated in this work, and the semi-predictive Flory-Huggins and the temperature-dependent NRTL-SAC models on the other hand, shows that for all the studied compounds, the machine learning model can deliver significantly improved capability to model as well as predict solubility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.