ArticleScientific reports2026
Photovoltaic power prediction and fault diagnosis method based on LSTM and transformer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prediction and fault diagnosis of photovoltaic power generation are crucial for the efficient utilization of clean energy, but traditional methods have limitations such as low efficiency and strong subjectivity. To this end, an innovative hybrid model combining bidirectional long short-term memory network and Transformer is proposed, integrating the improved Golden Jackal optimization algorithm, time convolutional neural network, and grey wolf algorithm optimized variational mode decomposition to achieve signal adaptive purification, bidirectional temporal dependency capture, and global attention focusing. The experimental results show that the research model has achieved high-precision prediction, with an average accuracy of 95.03% in all seasons, an average absolute error of 4.86 kW, a relative root mean square error of 8.46%, and no significant cross seasonal differences, verifying the stability of the model. In terms of fault diagnosis, the waveform difference of the fault signal is up to 35.2 mm, and the accuracy of classifying five types of faults is 96.87%. SHAP analysis shows that instantaneous irradiance and historical power have the highest contribution, and the component string current is negatively correlated, which conforms to the physical laws of photovoltaics. In terms of deployment, the complete model has a parameter count of 8.77 M and an accuracy rate of 97.08%, making it suitable for high-precision offline and cloud scenarios. These results indicate that the proposed model improves both fault recognition efficiency and prediction accuracy. This study provides a valuable reference for building accurate photovoltaic power prediction and fault diagnosis models under complex environments, thus promoting the development of clean energy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.