ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation and telemetry-based detection of GPS spoofing effects on UAV navigation using software-defined radio.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental investigation into the vulnerabilities of autonomous drone navigation systems under GPS spoofing attacks using Software Defined Radio (SDR). A low-cost spoofing framework was implemented using HackRF One and GPS-SDR-SIM to manipulate the navigation signals of an F450 quadcopter equipped with a Pixhawk 4 flight controller and a Ublox NEO-M8N GPS module. Both static and dynamic spoofing trials were conducted in controlled outdoor environments. During normal autonomous waypoint missions, the drone demonstrated stable sensor outputs and accurate trajectory tracking. However, under spoofed GPS conditions, the drone deviated from its intended path, breached geofenced boundaries, and exhibited unstable behaviour leading to an uncontrolled descent and crash landing instead of executing the intended Return-to-Launch (RTL) response. Detailed analysis of barometric altitude, yaw angle, magnetometer, vibration data, as well as GPS indicators such as satellite count and HDOP, revealed significant anomalies during spoofed flights. To enhance interpretability, a telemetry-based detection indicator was introduced by computing deviation thresholds between GPS, IMU, and barometric readings. These statistical correlations enabled the detection of spoofing-induced anomalies with over 90% reliability, offering a low-cost, platform-independent method for UAV spoofing awareness. These deviations underscore the susceptibility of GPS-dependent UAV systems to spoofing attacks. The study further demonstrates that cross-sensor anomaly detection without requiring additional hardware can serve as an effective strategy for real-time spoofing detection. This work contributes to a lightweight, platform-independent methodology for enhancing drone resilience against GPS spoofing threats through telemetry-based sensor fusion analytics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.