ArticleScientific reports2026
Magnetically recoverable Fe
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The remediation of water contaminated by persistent antibiotic residues necessitates advanced treatment technologies that combine high removal efficiency with facile operational recovery. This study presents the development of a magnetically retrievable composite adsorbent, synthesized via ionic cross-linking co-assembly of pre-formed Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles and ZIF-8 nanocrystallites with industrial-grade chitosan. Comprehensive characterization (PXRD, FTIR, SEM, BET) confirmed the successful integration of components into a cohesive, macroporous bead architecture with robust mechanical stability. Process optimization utilized a hierarchical approach: initial univariate screening identified key operational parameters, which subsequently informed a multivariate Box-Behnken design. The derived second-order response surface model (R² = 0.9930) provided a benchmark for comparison against multiple machine learning algorithms, including support vector regression (SVR), Artificial Neural Networks, and tree-based ensembles. The SVR model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy (R² = 0.9994, RMSE = 0.434) and reliable extrapolation (predicted R² = 0.9618), enabling precise parameter optimization. At the identified optimum conditions (10 mg L⁻¹ tetracycline, 300 mg L⁻¹ sorbent, 135 min, pH 8.5), a sequestration efficiency of 74.04% was achieved. The composite exhibited excellent reusability, retaining > 60% of its initial capacity over five consecutive adsorption-desorption cycles, facilitated by rapid magnetic separation. Kinetic studies revealed that uptake followed a pseudo-second-order model (R² = 0.991), indicative of chemisorption, with an experimental maximum capacity of 24.5 mg g⁻¹. By unifying low-cost materials, a clear structure-property relationship, and a sophisticated modeling framework, this work provides a practical, magnetically separable adsorption system for the targeted removal of tetracycline in engineered water treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.