ArticleScientific reports2026
Characteristics of refractive errors in children with intermittent exotropia compared with the general population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared refractive errors in children with intermittent exotropia (IXT) against the general population using two large nationwide datasets: the Korean Intermittent Exotropia Multicenter Study (KIEMS), involving 2,744 patients aged 5-18 years, and the Korean National Health Examination Survey (KNHANES), involving 1,224 participants. Age-specific spherical equivalent (SE) distributions in IXT patients were generally similar to the general population. While the non-dominant eye in IXT patients tended to be more myopic than the dominant eye, it did not exceed the myopia levels observed in the more myopic eyes of the general population. However, IXT patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of anisometropia, particularly in those older than 9 years (P<0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that refractive profiles, including SE and interocular differences, had a very weak linear relationship with exotropia angles ($R^2=0.000-0.005$). Additionally, convergence insufficiency type IXT was more myopic than other types, while poor distance control was associated with less myopia (P<0.05). In conclusion, children with IXT show a higher prevalence of anisometropia but not a significantly higher incidence of myopia compared to the general population. Furthermore, refractive profiles in IXT are not strongly correlated with the magnitude of exotropia angle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.