SynthesisScientific reports2026
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Among People Living with HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa in the Antiretroviral Therapy Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus retinitis has remained an alarming and potentially vision-threatening opportunistic disease in the population living with HIV, especially in cases of extreme immunosuppression. Although the introduction of antiretroviral therapy has led to a drastic decline in the number of cytomegalovirus retinitis cases reported in most parts of the world, the current epidemiology of cytomegalovirus retinitis in sub-Saharan Africa has seemed unusual in early reports, unexpectedly portraying low disease prevalence rates despite the high number of HIV cases in the concerned region. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of cytomegalovirus retinitis among people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa in the antiretroviral therapy era, and to identify associated risk factors. The search of databases included Medline using the search engine PubMed, Google Scholar, and the African Journals Online database named AJOL. For inclusion, studies must have included an eye examination to verify the presence of cytomegalovirus retinitis. The data was combined using the logit transformation model. Heterogeneity was tested using the I-squared test and the Cochran Q test. A total of ten studies involving 1,931 participants from nine sub-Saharan Africa countries were found eligible. The proportion of cytomegalovirus retinitis varied from 0.34% to 15.8%. Pooled prevalence was found to be 3% (95% CI: 1.6-5.4%) with low to moderate inter-study variation (I² = 17.8%). Substantial variation in the proportion was found in different sub-Saharan Africa regions; it was found to be less than 1% in West Africa, 3-4% in Southern Africa, 7% in East Africa and 6% in Central Africa. Across all studies, the strongest and most consistent risk factors for cytomegalovirus retinitis were profound immunosuppression, particularly CD4 < 50 cells/µL. Antiretroviral therapy-naïve status, poor adherence, and presence of advanced AIDS-defining illnesses were additional contextual risk markers. Cytomegalovirus retinitis is an under-recognized but important source of preventable blindness among people living with HIV. Prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa differed from that in Asian early antiretroviral therapy era cohorts but is relevant in settings where late HIV presentation occurs. Systematic retinal screening in people living with HIV with low CD4 counts < 50 cells/µL and expanded HIV care and treatment services are important to prevent blindness due to cytomegalovirus retinitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.