ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2026
Superior dorsal nigral hyperintensity depiction at 7 T MRI using CLEAR-DESS improves diagnosis performance of Parkinson's disease.
Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the qualitative and quantitative measurement of dorsal nigral hyperintensity (DNH) and its diagnostic efficacy for Parkinson's disease (PD) between 7 T MRI sequences: the combined liquid and blood vessel attenuation with refined double echo steady state (CLEAR-DESS) and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). Following sequence simulation and optimization, a prospective study enrolled 33 PD patients and 52 healthy controls, all undergoing 7 T MRI with CLEAR-DESS and SWI. Four blinded observers qualitatively assessed image quality and DNH visibility, while two independent readers performed quantitative analyses of signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). Excellent inter-observer agreement was noted for both qualitative assessments. Diagnostic performance at the DNH level showed CLEAR-DESS (4 observers; AUC: 0.90-0.96; sensitivity: 85%-96%; specificity: 88%-94%) significantly outperformed SWI (4 observers; AUC: 0.73-0.85; sensitivity: 65%-70%; specificity: 74%-89%). Similarly, at the patient level, CLEAR-DESS (4 observers; AUC: 0.91-0.96; sensitivity: 91%-94%; specificity: 88%-100%) surpassed SWI (4 observers; AUC: 0.79-0.87; sensitivity: 80%-89%; specificity: 60%-79%). CLEAR-DESS also showed significantly better DNH visualization slices, SNR, and CNR than SWI (all p < 0.001). The 7T CLEAR-DESS sequence provides superior DNH visualization and PD diagnostic performance compared to SWI, indicating its potential as a preferred choice for DNH evaluation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.