ArticleNPJ vaccines2026
MVA-BN monkeypox vaccine safety in a clinical trial in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05734508 (Cohort Events Monitoring), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cohort Events Monitoring (CEM) Study for the Assessment of Safety Profile of MVA-BN (Jynneos) Vaccine in Adult Personnel and Staff in the PALM-007 Study in Democratic Republic Of The Congo
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The MVA-BN vaccine is considered safe and effective and has been widely deployed to prevent monkeypox. However, safety and tolerability data from endemic areas are limited. We performed a single-arm clinical trial of the safety of the MVA-BN vaccine among adults in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05734508; Registered 21 February 2023). Participants were personnel working on a monkeypox therapeutics trial (PALM-007) conducted in a high-risk, endemic setting for monkeypox. Participants received two doses of vaccine 28 days apart and were actively followed up to 28 days after each dose to assess the safety profile of MVA-BN. From March 2023 to June 2024, 500 participants were enrolled and received their first vaccine dose; 494 (99%) received the second dose and associated follow-up. There were no adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher observed during the study. 175 participants (35%) reported at least one vaccination site AE, the most common of which was mild or moderate vaccination site pain (120/500 first dose recipients (24%); 48/494 second dose recipients (10%)). There was one recorded case of breakthrough monkeypox occurring approximately 3 months after the second dose. This observational study provides further evidence that the MVA-BN monkeypox vaccine is generally safe and well-tolerated. As previously reported, the most common AEs were mild or moderate injection site reactions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.