ReviewBlood cancer journal2026
Chronic myeloid leukemia: incorporation of recent advances into current treatment algorithms.
Review in Blood cancer journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several approved and investigational BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and STAMP inhibitors are used for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). In the frontline setting, multiple factors affect selection of therapy including the goal of treatment, cost of TKIs, CML risk, and patient's comorbidities. Achieving a complete cytogenetic response (BCR::ABL1 transcripts on the International Scale [IS] <1%) with TKI therapy within the first year is associated with normalization of survival, whereas achieving a deeper molecular response (BCR::ABL1 transcripts < 0.01% [IS]) may allow for treatment discontinuation with the possibility of treatment-free remission. Although standard doses are approved for each TKI, post approval studies have demonstrated that an optimal biologic dose is safer than and as effective as the approved dose. In cases of TKI toxicities, reducing the dose rather than switching TKIs is recommended unless the patient experiences a prohibitive toxicity, in which case the treatment should be changed. In patients experiencing failure of frontline therapy due to resistance or intolerance, multiple second- and third-line options are available, including second-generation TKIs, ponatinib, and asciminib, as well as novel investigational agents, including the ABL1 kinase domain inhibitors olverembatinib and ELVN-001 and the STAMP inhibitors TGRX-678 and TERN-701. In this review, we discuss the recent advances in the treatment of CML-CP and challenge some established management practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.