ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Cell-Type-Specific Synaptic Scaling Mechanisms Differentially Contribute to Associative Learning.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Excitatory synaptic scaling regulates network dynamics by proportionally adjusting excitatory synaptic strengths after sensory perturbations. During associative learning, blocking excitatory scaling in conditioned taste aversion paradigms prolongs generalized aversive responses and delays memory specificity. Recent evidence also implicates inhibitory synaptic scaling in the regulation of network dynamics. Specifically, parvalbumin (PV)-expressing inhibitory neurons, targeting perisomatic regions of excitatory (E) pyramidal neurons, and somatostatin (SST)-expressing neurons, targeting distal dendrites, exhibit distinct scaling responses. This leaves open the question of how complex plasticity mechanisms regulate recurrent excitatory-inhibitory circuit dynamics in associative learning. Using computational approaches, we demonstrate that Hebbian plasticity drives memory generalization to novel stimuli not presented during conditioning. Following conditioning, diverse synaptic scaling mechanisms progressively induce memory specificity, which can be regulated by top-down inputs. Our results reveal that, in the absence of excitatory scaling, PV-to-E scaling can effectively compensate and rescue memory specificity, highlighting the presence of degenerate mechanisms in the brain. Notably, in the process of establishing memory specificity, excitatory scaling and PV-to-E scaling function synergistically, while concurrently opposing SST-to-E scaling. The synergistic and antagonistic plasticity mechanisms are orchestrated to shape the temporal evolution of memory representations, from generalized to precise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.