ArticleJournal of Korean gerontological nursing2026
Digital device use, perceptions and intention to use digital healthcare among urban and rural older adults: A cross-sectional descriptive study.
Article in Journal of Korean gerontological nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOlder adults are potential beneficiaries of digital health technologies but remain vulnerable to the digital divide. This study aimed to compare digital accessibility, perceptions, and intention to use digital healthcare services among urban and rural older adults, and to identify associated factors.
methodsA cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 140 community-dwelling older adults aged 65 and above in urban and rural areas. Data were collected using structured questionnaires covering digital device ownership, usage patterns, perceived ease of use, digital self-efficacy, and perceptions of digital healthcare-assessed in four dimensions: expectations, concerns, emotional responses, and perceived necessity. Statistical analyses included t-tests, chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression.
resultsUrban older adults had higher ownership and usage rates of smartphones (χ2=5.78, p=.016) and the internet (χ2=18.53, p<.001), and significantly more experience with digital device education compared to rural older adults (χ2=5.85, p=.016). While no significant differences were found in expectations, concerns, and emotional responses, rural participants showed significantly higher perceived necessity (t=-2.30, p=.023). The overall intention to use digital healthcare services was high in both groups, and binary logistic regression analysis revealed that expectations (odds ratio [OR]=1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.10~2.89, p=.019) and perceived necessity (OR=2.24, 95% CI=1.39~3.60, p=.001) were significant predictors of intention to use.
conclusionPromoting digital healthcare adoption among older adults requires enhancing individual expectations and perceived needs beyond simply providing technology. In rural areas, strategies should focus on improving digital accessibility and offering tailored education programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.