ArticleBMJ open2026
Workplace incivility and bullying across healthcare professionals: patterns and correlates - a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo estimate the prevalence and frequency of workplace incivility and bullying across multiple healthcare roles; compare experiences among occupational groups; examine associations with psychological symptoms (stress, anxiety and depression); assess interrelations among mistreatment dimensions (experienced workplace incivility (EWI), witnessed workplace incivility (WWI), instigated workplace incivility (IWI and experienced workplace bullying (EWB)); and evaluate associations with demographic and contextual variables.
designCross-sectional study.
settingThree teaching hospitals in Arak, Iran, between March and December 2023.
participantsA stratified random sample of 550 healthcare workers was invited; 392 responded (response rate 71.3%) and 359 with complete data were included, comprising nurses, interns, residents, general practitioners and administrative staff. OUTCOME MEASURES: Workplace incivility (Workplace Incivility Scale), workplace bullying (Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised) and psychological symptoms (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 Items).
resultsThe sample (N=359) was 64% female with a mean age of 32 years. Significant differences were observed across occupational groups for WWI, IWI and EWB (all p<0.001). However, post hoc analyses indicated that most differences involved administrative staff, while clinical roles showed broadly comparable levels of exposure. Interns showed the highest prevalence of both EWI and EWB (38% and 69%, respectively). All mistreatment dimensions were positively correlated with each other (ρ=0.23-0.86) and with stress, anxiety and depression, particularly for EWI and EWB (ρ=0.39-0.62, p<0.03). In adjusted analyses, EWI and EWB remained associated with higher stress, anxiety and depression after adjustment (all p≤0.014), whereas WWI was associated only with stress (p=0.001) and IWI showed no independent associations. Demographic and contextual variables showed weak and inconsistent associations, except smoking, which was associated with higher mistreatment scores across all dimensions (p≤0.001).
conclusionsWorkplace incivility and bullying are widespread across healthcare roles, with broadly comparable exposure across clinical staff. Direct experiences of mistreatment showed the most consistent associations with psychological distress, and mistreatment dimensions appeared to operate within interconnected patterns. Addressing these issues requires system-level interventions targeting structural and cultural drivers to promote psychologically safe clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.