ArticleBMJ open2026
Three delays of malaria care-seeking in Malawi: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify psychosocial and structural barriers to prompt malaria care-seeking in Malawi by applying the Three Delays Model (delay 1: deciding to seek care; delay 2: reaching a facility; delay 3: receiving quality care).
designcross-sectional study.
settingNationally representative data collected from Malawi communities between 25 May 2021 and 1 July 2021.
participants913 female caregivers who reported a child with fever in the past 2 weeks. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Prompt care-seeking for fever (same or next day) from a qualified health provider.
resultsPrompt care-seeking was primarily associated with delay 1 (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.78) and psychosocial (aOR 0.59; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.79) factors. Significant factors included incorrect knowledge of malaria symptoms, cause and diagnosis (aOR 0.71: 95% CI 0.53 to 0.97), negative attitudes towards care-seeking (aOR 0.58; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.82), incorrect knowledge of when and where to seek care (aOR 0.19: 95% CI 0.07 to 0.50) and far distance from a health facility (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.93).
conclusionDespite the availability of free malaria services, significant bottlenecks remain in the initial decision-making phase. To reduce malaria mortality, national programmes should prioritise social and behaviour change interventions that move beyond general awareness to target specific care-seeking attitudes and intra-household decision-making dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.