ArticleSurgery2026
Critical differences among stakeholders in definitions of success following inguinal hernia repair in older adults.
Article in Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInguinal hernia repair is one of the most common elective operations performed in adults aged 65 years and older, but there is little information on how different groups of stakeholders define successful inguinal hernia repair. The purpose of this study was to compare how older veterans, surgeons, anesthesiologists, and Veterans Affairs leadership define success after inguinal hernia surgery.
methodsSemistructured interviews and focus groups explored the relative importance of several hernia-related outcomes with 40 veterans aged ≥65 years who recently underwent inguinal hernia repair, 10 surgeons, 9 anesthesiologists, and 7 Veterans Affairs hospital leaders.
resultsThe mean age of veteran participants was 73 years. All were male, 65% were White, and 33% were Black. Surgeons, anesthesiologists, and hospital leaders were 69% male. For veterans, the 3 most important outcomes defining successful hernia surgery were avoiding postoperative urinary retention, returning to normal physical function within 2 months of surgery, and minimizing cognitive dysfunction. For surgeons, the most important outcomes were returning to normal within 2 months after surgery, avoiding inguinodynia, and minimizing cognitive dysfunction. For anesthesiologists, the most important outcomes were returning to normal by 2 months, avoiding cognitive dysfunction, and preventing intraoperative pain. Hospital leaders agreed that normalization within 2 months and avoiding cognitive dysfunction were important, but they also considered readmission a critical outcome.
conclusionSurgery is only efficacious, cost effective, and ethical when it delivers outcomes that are important to patients. Discordance among patients, providers, and health systems can lead to miscommunication, ineffective or wasteful care, and poor outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.