ReviewTranslational oncology2026
Therapeutic vaccines targeting solid tumors: A series of clinical trial analysis over the past decade.
Review in Translational oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic cancer vaccines hold great promise, yet their clinical efficacy in solid tumors remains modest. We systematically analyzed 86 clinical trials published between 2015 and 2025 evaluating therapeutic vaccines across mRNA, DNA, peptide, dendritic cell, virus vector, and whole tumor cell platforms to understand their clinical utility and key challenges in development. Peptide-based vaccines dominated, while mRNA vaccines showed the fastest growth, often combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Among 1588 patients with advanced disease, the disease control rate was 53 % and the objective response rate 18 %. In adjuvant settings, 52 % of 461 patients experienced recurrence. Although 67 % exhibited ELISPOT-positive T-cell responses, no correlation with clinical efficacy was observed. Most adverse events were mild to moderate, with pyrexia, fatigue, and injection-site reactions predominating. Therapeutic vaccines thus demonstrate favorable safety and immunogenicity, but limited monotherapy efficacy, underscoring the need for combinatorial approaches and identifying personalized immunogenic neoantigens to enhance clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.