Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42208245›Full record

ReviewTranslational oncology2026

Therapeutic vaccines targeting solid tumors: A series of clinical trial analysis over the past decade.

Fengqi Qiu, Yilan Sun, Darren Wan-Teck Lim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fengqi QiuCancer Center, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: fengqi_qiu@zju.edu.cn.
Yilan SunCancer Center, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. Electronic address: sunylhz1974@126.com.
Darren Wan-Teck LimNational Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: darren.lim.w.t@singhealth.com.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic cancer vaccines hold great promise, yet their clinical efficacy in solid tumors remains modest. We systematically analyzed 86 clinical trials published between 2015 and 2025 evaluating therapeutic vaccines across mRNA, DNA, peptide, dendritic cell, virus vector, and whole tumor cell platforms to understand their clinical utility and key challenges in development. Peptide-based vaccines dominated, while mRNA vaccines showed the fastest growth, often combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Among 1588 patients with advanced disease, the disease control rate was 53 % and the objective response rate 18 %. In adjuvant settings, 52 % of 461 patients experienced recurrence. Although 67 % exhibited ELISPOT-positive T-cell responses, no correlation with clinical efficacy was observed. Most adverse events were mild to moderate, with pyrexia, fatigue, and injection-site reactions predominating. Therapeutic vaccines thus demonstrate favorable safety and immunogenicity, but limited monotherapy efficacy, underscoring the need for combinatorial approaches and identifying personalized immunogenic neoantigens to enhance clinical benefit.

Indexed as

Cancer vaccineImmunotherapyPersonalized neoantigensSolid tumorT-cell response

Identifiers

PMID42208245
PMCPMC13233596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.