ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic procedures in hearing healthcare in Brazil: time series analysis and regional inequalities COVID-19 and hearing diagnostics in Brazil.
Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the national and regional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic procedures in hearing healthcare in Brazil, highlighting temporal trends, regional disparities, and post-pandemic recovery.
methodsA retrospective, descriptive, ecological time series study was conducted using publicly available data from DATASUS, the national health database maintained by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Data from January 2009 to December 2024 were analyzed, covering audiometry, newborn hearing screening, Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE), and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR). Interrupted Time Series (ITS) and simple regression models were applied to assess changes across three periods: pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic. Analyses were stratified by national level, Brazil's five regions, and the state of São Paulo.
resultsAll major hearing diagnostic procedures experienced significant reductions at the onset of the pandemic. Audiometry volumes decreased by 18.5% nationally, with São Paulo showing the most pronounced decline (-26.3%). Newborn hearing screening remained stable during the pandemic but dropped by 15.4% in the post-pandemic period, while OAE (+31.1%) and ABR (+55.0%) eventually exceeded pre-pandemic levels. Recovery was heterogeneous: the North and Northeast showed proportionally greater rebounds, while Sao Paulo and the Central-West demonstrated limited recovery. Regional disparities were evident, with wealthier regions maintaining procedure volumes disproportionate to their population share.
conclusionThe pandemic caused marked disruptions in hearing healthcare delivery in Brazil, with heterogeneous recovery across regions. Vulnerable populations, particularly children and older adults, were disproportionately affected by delayed diagnoses and rehabilitation. While teleaudiology offered a partial solution during service suspensions, its effectiveness was constrained by structural and digital inequalities. Strengthening health system resilience will require prioritizing pediatric backlogs, integrating hearing health into healthy aging strategies, and embedding auditory care within broader frameworks to ensure continuity of essential services in future crises. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE (OXFORD 2011): 2b.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.