ArticlePloS one2026
Cost-effectiveness of various referral pathways to identify advanced fibrosis among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in primary care setting in Malaysia.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimMost international guidelines recommend a two-step approach using the Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) to identify advanced fibrosis, a key predictor of all-cause and liver-related mortality in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, VCTE is not available in most primary care settings in Malaysia, and there is scarce data on the cost-effectiveness of different approaches. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of three referral pathways for identifying advanced fibrosis among type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) patients with MASLD.
methodsWe developed a decision-analytical model from the healthcare provider's perspective, using 1,000 simulated patients to compare: (i) Current Practice (direct referral based on elevated alanine transaminase), (ii) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) Pathway using FIB-4 single-cutoff 1.3, and (iii) FIB-4 dual-cutoffs (1.3,3.25) followed by a gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) test for indeterminate cases (Sequential FIB-4/GGT Pathway). Current practice served as the reference comparator. The primary outcomes were the average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Model parameters were mainly derived from local studies. Direct medical costs were reported in 2024 Malaysian Ringgit (MYR).
resultsSequential FIB-4/GGT pathway had the lowest ACER at MYR930 per advanced fibrosis case identified, compared to MYR1,299 for current practice and MYR1,581 for the CPG pathway. Sequential FIB-4/GGT pathway was potentially more effective and less costly, demonstrating dominance over current practice with a cost savings of MYR2,911/additional advanced fibrosis case identified. CPG pathway was more effective and more costly than current practice, with an ICER of MYR3,785.
conclusionsSequential FIB-4/GGT pathway was cost-effective for identifying advanced fibrosis in T2DM patients with MASLD. This pragmatic approach could reduce tertiary care referrals, lower healthcare resource use and costs compared to current practice. CPG pathway was more effective than current practice, but incurred higher costs and required increased availability of VCTE within clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.