Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207812›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Mortality salience effects and status consumption-A reasoned action approach.

Jolien Arendsen, Guido M van Koningsbruggen, Marieke L Fransen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jolien ArendsenDepartment of Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1756-3186
Guido M van KoningsbruggenDepartment of Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marieke L FransenBehavioural Science Institute, Department of Communication Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior research suggests that mortality salience (MS) can promote status consumption, yet it remains unclear how these effects are formed. To address this gap, we applied the Reasoned Action Approach, which provides a systematic framework to examine how MS may influence intentions to engage in status consumption. Study 1, a belief elicitation study, identified the set of salient beliefs related to status consumption. Study 2 revealed that MS influenced two out of 29 beliefs underlying status consumption identified in Study 1. Additionally, experiential attitude was a weaker predictor of the intention to engage in status consumption after MS. However, no effects of MS were observed on the intention to purchase status products or its determinants. Taken together, these findings suggest that, although MS may influence some underlying beliefs about status consumption, these changes are too weak to translate into meaningful differences in consumers' behavioral intentions. By using the Reasoned Action Approach, the present research advances our understanding of how MS may or may not influence consumer intentions. It also suggests that MS's influence on status consumption may be more limited than previously assumed.

Indexed as

MortalityAdultFemaleHumansIntentionMaleTheory of Planned BehaviorYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42207812
PMCPMC13218501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.