Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207787›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Eliciting health beliefs: Difficulties and solutions.

Xiaoxue Sherry Gao, Rong Rong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaoxue Sherry GaoDepartment of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4081-387X
Rong RongDepartment of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent progress in the development of incentive-compatible belief elicitation methods, some unique challenges arise when researchers apply some methods to elicit one's beliefs about their own health status. First, the unavailability or unverifiability of one's own health outcomes to incentivize the elicitation procedure. Second, the opportunity to hedge against adverse health outcomes by increasing the associated monetary payoffs in an incentivized elicitation task. To solve these issues, we elicit participants' beliefs about their close peers as proxies for their beliefs about themselves. We first collected the health outcomes of others with similar health status using a pre-experiment survey. Then, we used the surveyed outcomes to incentivize the belief elicitation procedure in the laboratory experiment stage. We conclude that the elicited beliefs are reflective of their beliefs about their own health status because the elicited beliefs using our proposed method are highly correlated with the participants' own past health outcomes.

Indexed as

CultureHealth StatusFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID42207787
PMCPMC13218472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.