ArticlePloS one2026
Tissue scaffold architecture affects implant degradation and bone tissue regeneration: A novel in silico mechanobiological model analysing cell behavior, mechanical stress and degradation kinematics.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synthetic bone tissue scaffold function is controlled by both material and architecture. Experimental biomaterial approaches have brought significant advances in scaffold function, but scaffold architecture has not been fully explored. There are many scaffold architecture design options which could be more efficiently evaluated using computational methods. The aim of this study is to introduce a novel mechanobiological computational model to assess the effect of implant degradation, bone formation, and the influence of bone loading. A finite element model of a synthetic bone tissue scaffold within a rat bone defect supported by a fixation plate was coupled with an agent-based cell and degradation model (both bulk and surface degradation). The approach was partially validated using in vivo experimental mass-loss data and tested in a case study examining four poly-L-lactic acid tissue scaffolds with varying architectures. The model was run for 90 days to calculate results on cell behaviour, tissue formation and scaffold degradation. The results showed that scaffold architecture strongly influences degradation and cellular behaviour, with a filament thickness of 0.6 mm yielding 39 mm³ of new bone formation compared to 18 mm³ in a filament thickness of 0.2 mm, representing an approximate 117% increase at day 90. Cell migration was increased in higher porosity scaffold architectures by 31% when changing from 20.9% (T4) to 54.7% (T1) porosity. The mechanobiological computational model is, to the authors' knowledge, the first time that implant degradation kinetics, mechanical environment, and cellular behavior have been combined in an in silico approach. The results show the importance of scaffold architecture design in the function of bone healing aided by tissue scaffold technology, emphasizing the importance of shape as well as material to improve implant function. Future work should aim to improve degradation modelling to include localised pH, autocatalysis and varying degradation rates due to chemical changes. Additionally, models should also include angiogenesis to account for the importance of revascularization in bone healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.