Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207695›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026

A 40-Year-Old Man With 2-Year Chronic Epigastric Pain From a Retained 18-cm Toothbrush: Endoscopic Management and Clinical Decision-Making.

Jingjing Hu, Yinqing Hu, Dayong Sun, Shihua Ding, Jiahuang Huang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingjing HuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yinqing HuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Dayong SunDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Shihua DingDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jiahuang HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5811-7170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Foreign body ingestion is common in children, whereas ingestion of non-food objects in adults is uncommon. Toothbrush ingestion is particularly rare. Because of their length and rigidity, toothbrushes are unlikely to pass spontaneously through the gastrointestinal tract and can cause pressure injury, ulceration, perforation, or fistula if retained. We report a case of chronic epigastric pain caused by long-term retention of a swallowed toothbrush and highlight the value of endoscopy when radiologic findings appear more severe than the clinical presentation. CASE REPORT A 40-year-old man presented with intermittent epigastric pain for 2 years. After repeated questioning, he reported accidentally swallowing an 18-cm plastic toothbrush during alcohol intoxication 20 years earlier. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) performed at another hospital demonstrated a linear foreign body extending from the gastric antrum to the descending duodenum, with suspected adhesion to the liver and possible sinus tract formation. However, the patient had no fever, peritoneal signs, or other evidence of major intra-abdominal complications. Because the concerning imaging findings were not consistent with the relatively benign clinical picture, and because the patient requested diagnostic confirmation before surgery, upper endoscopy was performed. The toothbrush was identified and removed intact with a polypectomy snare. Follow-up endoscopic inspection showed no perforation, fistula, or active bleeding. The epigastric pain resolved immediately after removal. CONCLUSIONS This case shows that endoscopic evaluation is important in patients with retained gastrointestinal foreign bodies, especially when cross-sectional imaging may overestimate the extent of injury. Endoscopy can clarify the diagnosis and provide definitive treatment while avoiding unnecessary surgery.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainChronic PainForeign BodiesStomachToothbrushingAdultHumansMaleTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID42207695
PMCPMC13224771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.