Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207642›Full record

ArticleCell reports2026

Neural population dynamics of direct electrical stimulation of neocortex.

Jordan L Hickman, Grant Hughes, Eashan Sahai, Moriah Miles, Daniel J Denman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jordan L HickmanDepartment of Biophysics and Physiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Grant HughesDepartment of Biophysics and Physiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Eashan SahaiDepartment of Biophysics and Physiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Moriah MilesDepartment of Biophysics and Physiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Daniel J DenmanDepartment of Biophysics and Physiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: daniel.denman@cuanschutz.edu.

Funding

Interrogating the propagation of electrical stimulation across scales in vivoR01NS120850 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DENMAN, DANIEL JAMES · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
Millisecond resolution statistics of cortical populationsR00EY028612 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DENMAN, DANIEL JAMES · 2019 to 2021
$859k
NEI NIH HHS R00 EY028612NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS120850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial electrical stimulation is foundational in neuroscience and clinical neuromodulation, yet it remains unclear as to how applied electrical fields engage neural tissue and influence perception. Using three orthogonal Neuropixels probes in mouse visual areas, we record extracellular voltages and spikes with sub-millisecond resolution in three dimensions around a stimulation source. The evoked potential extends asymmetrically and increases sub-linearly with amplitude, influenced by anatomical heterogeneity. Increasing amplitude increases the density, but not spatial extent, of directly responsive neurons; however, fewer than 5% of neurons are activated. Fast-spiking interneurons are recruited nearer the source, whereas pyramidal neurons show anisotropic activation. Direct responses are polarity and amplitude selective. Sparse direct spiking drive large, asymmetric cortical responses and modulates >50% of neurons at higher amplitudes. Perceptually, mice weakly detect single pulses, and performance does not improve with amplitude. Thus, anatomy and spatiotemporal patterning-not spike counts-govern physiological and perceptual impact, informing biomimetic, multi-contact prostheses.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationNeocortexNeuronsAction PotentialsAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPyramidal CellsVisual CortexCP: neuroscienceelectrical stimulationICMSintracortical microstimulationneural dynamicsneuromodulationNeuropixelsperceptual detectionvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID42207642
PMCPMC13404931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.