ArticleCell reports2026
Neural population dynamics of direct electrical stimulation of neocortex.
Article in Cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracranial electrical stimulation is foundational in neuroscience and clinical neuromodulation, yet it remains unclear as to how applied electrical fields engage neural tissue and influence perception. Using three orthogonal Neuropixels probes in mouse visual areas, we record extracellular voltages and spikes with sub-millisecond resolution in three dimensions around a stimulation source. The evoked potential extends asymmetrically and increases sub-linearly with amplitude, influenced by anatomical heterogeneity. Increasing amplitude increases the density, but not spatial extent, of directly responsive neurons; however, fewer than 5% of neurons are activated. Fast-spiking interneurons are recruited nearer the source, whereas pyramidal neurons show anisotropic activation. Direct responses are polarity and amplitude selective. Sparse direct spiking drive large, asymmetric cortical responses and modulates >50% of neurons at higher amplitudes. Perceptually, mice weakly detect single pulses, and performance does not improve with amplitude. Thus, anatomy and spatiotemporal patterning-not spike counts-govern physiological and perceptual impact, informing biomimetic, multi-contact prostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.