Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207527›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2026

A Clinically Relevant Threshold of Impaired Contrast Sensitivity Among Older US Adults.

Shu Xu, Mickey Nguyen, Yunshu Zhou, Mengyao Hu, Joshua R Ehrlich, Lindsey B De Lott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shu XuInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mickey NguyenMedical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Yunshu ZhouOphthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mengyao HuInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Joshua R EhrlichInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lindsey B De LottMichigan Sensory Health and Aging Research Collaborative (Mi-SHARC), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

Vision Impairment in the National Health and Aging Trends StudyR01EY034479 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Joshua Robert Ehrlich · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
Sensory Aging, Late-Life Wellbeing, and ADRD Research Infrastructure to Catalyze Practice and PolicyR61AG089063 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DEAL, JENNIFER ANNE, EHRLICH, JOSHUA ROBERT · 2024 to 2025
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034479NIA NIH HHS R61 AG089063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Contrast sensitivity (CS) is a critical yet underused measure of visual function that reflects the ability to detect subtle differences in luminance between an object and its background. Although poor CS is associated with falls, cognitive decline, and reduced independence in older adults, existing thresholds lack functional relevance. Objective: To identify a CS threshold associated with functional visual disability. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal cohort study used data from rounds 12 (2022) and 13 (2023) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older in the US. Analyses included 4475 community-dwelling participants with available binocular contrast sensitivity and self-reported vision data. Data were analyzed from September 2024 to January 2026. Exposures: Logarithm-scaled, binocular-presenting CS (logCS). Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported visual disability (SRVD), defined by difficulty recognizing faces, reading newspaper print, or seeing the television across a room. Covariates include age, education, race, income, visual acuity, frailty, and multimorbidity. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the association between CS and SRVD, and survey-weighted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to identify an optimal CS threshold using the Youden index. Results: Weighted mean logCS (SE) among participants was 1.72 (<0.01). At baseline, the mean contrast sensitivity in individuals with SRVD was 1.49 (0.03) logCS compared with 1.73 (<0.01) logCS among those without SRVD. Participants who developed new SRVD at 1-year follow-up demonstrated a mean decline in logCS from 1.62 to 1.56 logCS. Each 0.1-unit decrease in baseline logCS was independently associated with 12% higher odds of incident SRVD (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16). A threshold of 1.60 logCS maximized discrimination for functional visual disability (sensitivity, 67% [95% CI, 62%-71%]; specificity, 70% [95% CI, 69%-72%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a threshold of 1.60 logCS represented the functional threshold at which older adults began to experience SRVD. This functionally anchored cutoff provides a benchmark for interpreting CS measures, although sensitivity and specificity were moderate.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityPersons with Visual DisabilitiesSensory ThresholdsVision DisordersVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleUnited StatesVision, Binocular

Identifiers

PMID42207527
PMCPMC13220146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.