ArticleJAMA network open2026
Validation of a 2-Gene Blood Test for Kawasaki Disease in Febrile Children.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long Noncoding RNA Associations Define an Interferon-Myeloid Immune Axis in Kawasaki Disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Long noncoding RNA associations with an IFI27-MCEMP1 transcript pattern in Kawasaki disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Kawasaki disease (KD) remains a clinical diagnosis without an objective molecular test. Early identification is critical to prevent coronary artery complications through timely intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Objective: To validate a 2-gene whole-blood quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay measuring IFI27 and MCEMP1 expression for distinguishing KD from other pediatric febrile illnesses. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter diagnostic study was conducted in Taiwan and Shanghai, China. Patient blood samples were collected prospectively between 2012 and 2023 in Taiwan and between 2022 and 2023 in Shanghai and analyzed retrospectively from children younger than 8 years with KD and febrile controls (FCs) with viral, bacterial, or mixed infections. Data were analyzed from January 2022 to August 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnostic accuracy of a prespecified 2-gene KD score derived from change in cycle threshold values normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios. Results: A total of 541 children (mean [SD] age, 3.7 [1.9] years; 300 [55.5%] male), including 243 children with KD and 298 febrile controls, were analyzed. The KD score achieved an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94), with a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI, 93%-97%) and a specificity of 82% (95% CI, 78%-86%). The positive likelihood ratio was 5.12, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.05. Performance was consistent across cohorts, including incomplete KD, diverse FC etiologies, and coronary artery phenotypes. The assay was implemented as a laboratory-developed test. Analytical validation demonstrated high linearity (R2 > 0.99), precision (coefficient of variation <5%), and sample stability for up to 6 days at 4 °C or for 24 hours at room temperature. Conclusions and Relevance: This diagnostic study found that a 2-gene laboratory-developed whole-blood qPCR assay measuring IFI27 and MCEMP1 expression accurately distinguished KD from other febrile illnesses using standard molecular platforms. Prospective evaluation in broader populations is warranted to determine its clinical utility for reducing diagnostic delay and coronary complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.