Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207512›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

High-Deductible Health Plan Enrollment and Buprenorphine Dispensing.

Kao-Ping Chua, Amy S Bohnert, Rena M Conti, Pooja Lagisetty, Ushapoorna Nuliyalu, Thuy D Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kao-Ping ChuaSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Amy S BohnertDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Rena M ContiDepartment of Markets, Public Policy, and Law, Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pooja LagisettyDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Ushapoorna NuliyaluSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Thuy D NguyenDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Buprenorphine can prevent opioid overdose deaths among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Among privately insured patients using buprenorphine, it is unclear whether switching from a non-high-deductible health plan (HDHP) to an HDHP is associated with changes in buprenorphine dispensing or OUD-related health care visits. Objective: To evaluate the association between switching to an HDHP, buprenorphine dispensing, and OUD-related health care visits. Design, Setting, and Participants: Repeated cross-sectional difference-in-differences analysis of the 2010 to 2023 Optum Labs Data Warehouse, a longitudinal clinical database with deidentified claims. Analyses included privately insured adults who were continuously enrolled throughout a baseline and follow-up year and had buprenorphine dispensing in the baseline year. The treatment group included patients who switched from a non-HDHP to an HDHP. The control group included patients who remained in a non-HDHP. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2025, through February 1, 2026. Exposure: Switching to an HDHP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Annual number of days with active buprenorphine prescriptions; annual number of OUD-related outpatient visits; annual number of OUD-related emergency department visits or hospitalizations. Linear models with patient fixed effects compared changes in outcomes among the treatment and control groups. In a subgroup analysis, the treatment group was limited to patients experiencing a deductible increase exceeding the median of $1250. Results: Among 14 801 included patients (9419 [63.6%] male), switching to an HDHP was associated with a differential decrease in the number of days with active buprenorphine prescriptions (-29.0; 95% CI, -35.0 to -22.9) but not with changes in OUD-related outpatient visits (-0.5; 95% CI, -1.0 to 0.05) or OUD-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations (4.0 events per 100 patients; 95% CI, -0.5 to 8.4 events per 100 patients). In the subgroup analysis, switching to an HDHP was associated with a differential decrease in the number of OUD-related outpatient visits (-1.0; 95% CI, -1.8 to -0.3). Results for other outcomes were similar to the overall analysis. Conclusions and Relevance: In this repeated cross-sectional study using difference-in-differences analysis of privately insured patients using buprenorphine, those who switched to an HDHP were more likely to decrease buprenorphine use. When deductible increases were large, patients who switched to an HDHP were also more likely to decrease the number of OUD-related outpatient visits. Findings suggest that switching to an HDHP may be associated with heightened barriers to OUD treatment.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineDeductibles and CoinsuranceInsurance, HealthOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesBuprenorphine

Identifiers

PMID42207512
PMCPMC13220109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.