ReviewInternational journal of hematology2026
Clinical implications of minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in multiple myeloma (MM) therapy, including quadruplet regimens, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, and bispecific antibodies, have dramatically improved outcomes, necessitating disease assessment tools that are more sensitive than the conventional serological criteria. Consequently, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity has emerged as a robust surrogate endpoint for survival. This review summarizes the current methodologies for MRD detection, primarily next-generation sequencing (NGS) and next-generation flow (NGF), and evaluates the prognostic significance of MRD negativity across the disease spectrum. We herein discuss key data from major clinical trials in both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory settings, highlighting the high rates of MRD negativity achieved with novel therapeutic classes. A central focus is the evolving paradigm of MRD-adapted therapy, which utilizes dynamic MRD assessment to guide treatment decisions by allowing escalation in high-risk patients or de-escalation to reduce toxicity in deep responders. In addition, we address the optimal timing for MRD testing and the challenges of integrating these assessments into routine clinical practice. In conclusion, this review emphasizes the growing utility of MRD as not only a prognostic biomarker but also a critical tool to drive personalized treatment strategies and further enhance long-term outcomes in MM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42207485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.