ArticlePharmacological reports : PR2026
Selective non-nuclear estrogen receptor activation with PaPE-1 evokes neuroprotection involving mTOR/MEK in an in vitro model of hypoxic/ischemic injury.
Article in Pharmacological reports : PR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypoxic/ischemic brain injuries, including ischemic stroke and perinatal asphyxia, remain major causes of mortality and long-term neurological disability, establishing a demand for therapeutic strategies suitable against the multifactorial nature of underlying mechanisms. Estrogen receptors (ERs) signaling is known to exert neuroprotective effects, however, genomic ER activation is associated with serious adverse effects, including carcinogenesis and thromboembolisms. Pathway Preferential Estrogen-1 (PaPE-1), a compound that selectively activates the non-nuclear subset of ERs, may provide neuroprotection, thereby overcoming the deleterious effects. The aim of this study was to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the neuroprotective effects of PaPE-1 in an in vitro model of hypoxic-ischemic neuronal injury, with particular emphasis on non-nuclear estrogen receptor signaling and its downstream pathways.
methodsPrimary mouse cortical neuronal cells were subjected to 6 hours of experimental hypoxic/ischemic injury, followed by 18 hours of post-treatment with PaPE-1. Subsequently, a variety of biochemical assessments were conducted, including measurements of neuronal viability, cell death, and formation of autophagy-related vesicles. Moreover, the influence of PaPE-1 was assessed with molecular methods, encompassing measurements of gene and protein expression level and a set of epigenetic-related parameters, for instance, assessment of global DNA/RNA methylation and locus-specific methylation of genes and miRNA expression. To dissect signaling pathways, selective pharmacological inhibitors targeting mTOR/MEK1/2 and autophagy regulators were applied. ER subtype involvement was examined using ER-selective antagonists and specific siRNA silencing.
resultsNon-nuclear ER activation with PaPE-1 attenuated maladaptive autophagy, RNA/DNA oxidative stress damage, and neuronal degeneration while contributing to the regulation of gene expression and epigenetic processes. Evocation of robust neuroprotection involved modulation of mTOR and MEK1/2 signaling, predominantly mediated by estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1).
conclusionIn conclusion, PaPE-1 exhibits a multitarget mode of action that provides broad-spectrum protection against hypoxic/ischemic neuronal injuries. Considering its complexity of action and confirmed strong, neuroprotective activity, this compound holds promise for broader evaluation across different brain cell types and in vivo models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.