ReviewClinical rheumatology2026
Temporal artery biopsy in polyarteritis nodosa: a case-based narrative literature review.
Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis of medium-sized arteries, and histologic confirmation is often challenging. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is established for suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA), but is rarely performed in PAN. We describe a 27-year-old Japanese man who presented with melena and acute visual loss in the right eye. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed multiple visceral aneurysms involving the hepatic, renal, and mesenteric arteries, with active extravasation from a jejunal artery aneurysm. Ophthalmologic evaluation confirmed central retinal artery occlusion. Renal biopsy showed no evidence of vasculitis. During hospitalization, he developed a new medullary infarction, and re-examination revealed induration of the superficial temporal artery. TAB was therefore performed and demonstrated neutrophil-rich necrotizing arteritis with fibrinoid change, supporting the diagnosis of PAN. To contextualize the diagnostic role of TAB in PAN, we reviewed the literature and identified 21 TAB-confirmed cases including this patient. Most reported TAB-confirmed PAN cases underwent biopsy because GCA was initially suspected, and the histopathologic findings were heterogeneous; a neutrophil-predominant necrotizing pattern with fibrinoid change-particularly in the absence of multinucleated giant cells-may prompt reconsideration beyond GCA. The diagnostic yield of TAB in unselected PAN has not been studied, and the available evidence is limited to case reports and TAB-based cohorts. Nevertheless, TAB may be considered a pragmatic option for histologic confirmation when conventional biopsy sites are impractical or high risk, particularly in the presence of cranial ischemic manifestations or temporal-artery abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42207464What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.