Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207420›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2026

The brain network underlying social participation: a multimodal, data-driven investigation.

Mia G Casburn, Aodán Laighneach, Evie Doherty, Fergus Quilligan, Andrea Fernandes, Emma Corley, Gary Donohoe, Pilib Ó Broin, Derek W Morris, Dara M Cannon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mia G CasburnCenter for Neuroimaging, Cognition and Genomics (NICOG), Galway Neuroscience Center, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland. miacasburn02@gmail.com.
Aodán LaighneachCenter for Neuroimaging, Cognition and Genomics (NICOG), Galway Neuroscience Center, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Evie DohertyCenter for Neuroimaging, Cognition and Genomics (NICOG), Galway Neuroscience Center, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Fergus QuilliganCenter for Neuroimaging, Cognition and Genomics (NICOG), Galway Neuroscience Center, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Andrea FernandesCenter for Neuroimaging, Cognition and Genomics (NICOG), Galway Neuroscience Center, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Emma CorleyCenter for Neuroimaging, Cognition and Genomics (NICOG), Galway Neuroscience Center, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Gary DonohoeCenter for Neuroimaging, Cognition and Genomics (NICOG), Galway Neuroscience Center, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Pilib Ó BroinSchool of Mathematical & Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Derek W MorrisCenter for Neuroimaging, Cognition and Genomics (NICOG), Galway Neuroscience Center, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Dara M CannonCenter for Neuroimaging, Cognition and Genomics (NICOG), Galway Neuroscience Center, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying brain phenotypes influencing social participation may help understand social deficits in psychiatric disorders. Previous research shows methodological inconsistencies, lacking consensus on which brain regions are crucial. Data-driven variable selection may overcome this, facilitating unbiased replication and discovery of social brain regions. We compare data-driven selection to literature-identification of brain regions in explaining social participation variation. In 37,576 UK Biobank participants (mean age 65 ± 8, 53% female) with structural and functional neuroimaging data, social participation (range 0-10) was derived by combining leisure activity participation and friend/family visits. First, literature review identified a subset of brain regions previously associated with social measures. Secondly, recursive feature elimination selected a subset of imaging-derived phenotypes in 25% (n = 9,394) of the sample. Hierarchical regression in the remaining 75% (n = 28,152) compared whether data-selected or literature-identified brain phenotype-sets explained more variance in social participation. Individual p-values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate. Recursive feature elimination selected 198 imaging-derived phenotypes. Data-selected imaging-derived-phenotypes explained more variance in social participation (1.31%) than literature-identified (0.84%, F = 3.17, p < 0.0001). Seventeen imaging-derived-phenotypes were associated with social participation including mid-posterior-cingulate, inferior-frontal/orbital and insular thickness, and functional connectivity between pericentral with medial frontoparietal and cerebellar networks. Multi-modal brain imaging-derived phenotypes can predict small but significant variation in social participation. We confirmed previously identified social brain associations of pericentral and medial frontoparietal, and orbital regions while also implicating novel relationships with the insula, acoustic radiation, and lateral frontoparietal networks. This highlights the value of data-driven approaches in solidifying social brain regional involvement, outperforming literature-based methods, and revealing previously undetected relationships.

Indexed as

BrainSocial ParticipationAgedBrain MappingFemaleHumansLeisure ActivitiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysNeuroimagingPhenotypeUK BiobankData-Driven AnalysisMultimodal neuroimagingSocial BrainSocial participationUK biobank

Identifiers

PMID42207420
PMCPMC13219186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.