ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2026
Multivariate mendelian randomization for joint inferences of correlated outcomes.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mendelian randomization (MR) typically analyzes causal relationships between exposures and outcomes independently, potentially missing important correlations among related outcomes. Few methods exist to jointly analyze multiple outcomes in MR studies. We propose two novel multivariate approaches for handling correlated outcomes in MR. Multivariate inverse-variance weighted MR (multivariate MR-IVW) incorporates outcome correlations through multivariate meta-analysis. Multivariate MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (multivariate MR-PRESSO) test leverages Mahalanobis distance to detect heterogeneous instruments across correlated outcomes. We evaluated these methods through comprehensive simulation study. Multivariate methods were applied to investigate causal relationships between DNA methylation at cg11294513 and five zinc finger gene expressions using Framingham Heart Study and Genotype-Tissue Expression project data. Simulation study demonstrated that multivariate MR-IVW consistently achieved lower bias and mean squared error compared to univariate method. For global hypothesis testing, multivariate MR-IVW showed substantially higher sensitivity than univariate method (e.g., 95% vs. 52% at r = 0.8 with two outcomes) while maintaining controlled false positive rates. Multivariate MR-PRESSO detected outlying SNPs with substantially higher sensitivity compared to univariate method (e.g., 85-90% vs. 35-40% with four outcomes and balanced pleiotropy). In real data application, MR analysis revealed significant causal effects of DNA methylation at cg11294513 on all five zinc finger genes. Multivariate MR-PRESSO identified additional heterogeneous instruments that were undetected by univariate analysis. Multivariate MR methods provide superior causal effect estimation and pleiotropy detection, as well as more flexible hypothesis testing by leveraging outcome correlations. These approaches enable comprehensive analysis of complex multi-omics data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42207415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.