Trial reportJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026
Substrate ablation as concomitant treatment for left atrial macroreentrant tachycardia (SLICE-LAMRT): rationale and study design.
Trial report in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05842499 (Substrate abLatIon as Concomitant trEatment for Left Atrial Macroreentrant Tachycardia - SLICE LAMRT), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Substrate abLatIon as Concomitant trEatment for Left Atrial Macroreentrant Tachycardia - SLICE LAMRT
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeft atrial macroreentrant tachycardias (LAMRTs) are increasing, particularly following atrial fibrillation ablation. Conventional ablation strategies based on activation mapping are limited by the presence of multiple inducible circuits and high recurrence rates. The potential benefit of a substrate-guided approach targeting reproducible anatomical reentry pathways remains unknown. We hypothesize that a substrate-guided approach, targeting reproducible anatomical pathways sustaining reentry rather than only inducible tachycardias, will improve rhythm control and clinical outcomes compared with conventional ablation strategies.
objectiveThe goal of this trial is to determine whether substrate-guided catheter ablation is superior to activation-guided ablation in reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with LAMRT.
methodsThe SLICE-LAMRT trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1) study conducted at 12 centers in Spain. Patients and clinical event adjudicators are blinded to treatment allocation. Patients with LAMRT and significant left atrial low-voltage substrate are randomized to either a conventional activation-guided ablation strategy, based on high-density mapping and entrainment pacing of clinical and inducible tachycardias, or a substrate-guided approach consisting of a predefined left atrial ablation line set. This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05842499). The primary endpoint is atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and time to first recurrence after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary endpoints include procedural performance, acute efficacy, major clinical outcomes (including hospitalizations and mortality), and echocardiographic parameters. Safety endpoints include procedure-related adverse events such as death, stroke, cardiac tamponade, vascular complications, and other major complications.
conclusionThe SLICE-LAMRT trial will provide the first randomized evidence comparing substrate-guided and activation-guided ablation strategies in LAMRT. By addressing a major unmet clinical need, this study may inform and refine ablation strategies for atypical atrial flutter and support a shift toward substrate-based approaches in complex atrial arrhythmias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42207412What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.