Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207398›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2026

Procurement in German office based ambulatory physician practices: system specific challenges and evidence based management strategies.

Matthias B Stope

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthias B StopeDivision for Physical Plasma Medicine, Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. matthias.stope@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4129-8854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Procurement is an important managerial function in healthcare, influencing supply continuity, process stability, and quality assurance. While hospital procurement has been studied extensively, evidence on procurement structures in German ambulatory care remains limited and conceptually fragmented. In particular, office based physician practices, group practices, medical care centers, outpatient hospital departments, and physician networks are often discussed under the same umbrella term, although these organizational forms differ substantially in governance, scale, and purchasing capacity.This narrative, concept driven review focuses specifically on office based ambulatory physician practices in Germany, with particular attention to small group practices in urban primary care settings. The available literature indicates that direct peer reviewed evidence quantifying procurement specific cost shares in this sector remains scarce. International physician practice economics further suggests that procurement related savings alone are unlikely to generate large absolute efficiency gains across all ambulatory settings. Procurement should therefore be understood not only as a cost factor, but also as a managerial field affecting supply reliability, workflow continuity, coordination, and resilience.Compared with hospitals, office based ambulatory practices are characterized by smaller purchasing volumes, limited economies of scale, fragmented supplier relationships, and restricted administrative capacity. Instruments such as ABC VED analyses, Kanban based replenishment, periodic stock review, and structured supplier arrangements may support procurement management in these settings. The proposed model should be interpreted as a practice oriented framework rather than as an intervention with proven large scale cost effects.

Indexed as

Cost structure analysisGroup purchasing organizationsHealthcare supply chainHealth services researchOrganizational resiliencePractice efficiencyPrimary care management

Identifiers

PMID42207398
PMCPMC13217684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.