Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207371›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

Increasing and more consistent use of pre-biopsy MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: insights from a population-based study in the Netherlands.

C C Loeff, I G Schoots, P J van Leeuwen, D E Oprea-Lager, S Al-Uwini, L A L M Kiemeney, I M van Oort, K K H Aben, B L Heesterman, ADMINISTRATE Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

C C LoeffDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.loeff@iknl.nl.
I G SchootsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9804-0603
P J van LeeuwenDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D E Oprea-LagerDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
S Al-UwiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
L A L M KiemeneyScience department IQ Health, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
I M van OortDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
K K H Aben *Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
B L Heesterman *Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
ADMINISTRATE Study Group

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding KWF; IKNL 2022-14701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGuidelines recommend MRI before prostate biopsy in men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). However, real-world data on clinical use are scarce. This study aims to provide comprehensive insight into the nationwide use of pre-biopsy MRI across the Netherlands. MATERIALS AND

methodsMen with biopsy-proven primary PCa diagnosed between 2019 and 2023, were identified through the Netherlands Cancer Registry (main cohort; n = 50,987). A historical cohort included similar cases from 2015 to 2016 (n = 5183). Four MRI-related periods were defined: historical (2015-2016), pre-implementation (2019), implementation (2020), and post-implementation (2021-2023). Mixed-effects logistic regression analyses assessed factors associated with pre-biopsy MRI use and heterogeneity across periods. Inter-hospital variation was quantified using case-mix (age, PSA, clinical disease stage) adjusted hospital-specific probabilities.

resultsPre-biopsy MRI use increased from 17 to 74% between 2015 and 2023. Across all periods (main cohort), men over 70 and those with a PSA > 50 µg/L or cT3-4 disease were significantly less likely to undergo pre-biopsy MRI than younger men, those with PSA < 10 µg/L, or cT1 disease, respectively. Heterogeneity in effect size across periods was observed for all factors except age. Inter-hospital variation was present in all MRI-related periods, although it significantly decreased over time. Estimated 75% midrange rates varied from 9.7-86% (pre-implementation) to 62-88% (post-implementation).

conclusionsPre-biopsy MRI use in PCa diagnosis has markedly increased and has become more consistent across hospitals. Over time, its use became more targeted, focusing on patients without signs of advanced disease, in accordance with EAU guidelines recommendations. Continued efforts to standardize MRI use may improve equity and optimize patient outcomes. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study evaluates the nationwide implementation of pre-biopsy MRI in PCa diagnosis, revealing increased and more targeted use, demonstrating consistency across hospitals, and providing insights to guide standardization and optimize patient outcomes. KEY POINTS: Comprehensive population-level data on the uptake of pre-biopsy MRI after implementing guideline recommendations are essential for clinical practice evaluations on a national level. In the Netherlands, these data show an increase in the uptake of pre-biopsy MRI over time, demonstrate consistent patterns across hospitals, and illustrate a shift towards use in patients without advanced disease, aligning with EAU guidelines recommendations. Ongoing efforts to implement and standardize pre-biopsy MRI use in routine clinical practice are critical to promote equity and optimize patient outcomes on a population-based level.

Indexed as

Hospital variationMagnetic resonance imagingProstate biopsyProstate cancerProstate MRI

Identifiers

PMID42207371
PMCPMC13219667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.