ArticleJournal of prevention (2022)2026
Developing Quality Criteria for Community-Based Loneliness Interventions in Older Adults: An Evidence-Informed Framework.
Article in Journal of prevention (2022), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community-based interventions addressing social isolation among older adults lack systematic quality assessment frameworks despite their public health importance. This study developed evidence-informed quality criteria for complex community-based health promotion interventions using a transdisciplinary approach. We conducted systematic literature searches for guidelines and evidence syntheses on social isolation interventions, followed by quality assessment using the following standardised tools: the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2). Quality criteria were categorised using a lifecycle-based framework and were supplemented with health promotion principles. A stakeholder panel (practitioners, funders, and target group representatives; n = 6) prioritised criteria through a two-round Delphi process including an intermediate workshop. We developed 39 evidence-informed quality criteria organised into four lifecycle domains: Programme Conditions (7 criteria), Programme Planning (17 criteria), Programme Implementation (12 criteria), and Programme Results (3 criteria). The framework integrates evidence from one clinical guideline, six systematic reviews, and established health promotion principles. This study demonstrates the systematic development of evidence-informed quality criteria through participatory stakeholder engagement. The framework provides practitioners and policymakers with a comprehensive tool for planning, implementing, and evaluating community-based interventions targeting social isolation among older adults, enhancing accountability and programme improvement capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42207353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.