ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Spirituality, religion, and meaning-making in suicide loss: an international overview of clinical responses and therapeutic approaches.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicide loss confronts individuals with significant existential challenges, positioning spirituality, religion, and meaning-making as central dimensions of post-suicide bereavement. This overview synthesizes findings from existing review studies to explore the complex mechanisms of these dimensions and identify corresponding clinical responses. A narrative synthesis of nine peer-reviewed review papers was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The search covered a decade from 2015 to 2025, with an updated search in March 2026. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, SANRA, and PRISMA-ScR. Data were analyzed using qualitative software to identify and synthesize key thematic patterns. The synthesis revealed three critical, interlocking themes: (1) The Paradox of Spiritual Engagement, highlighting the tension between religious comfort and spiritual struggle; (2) Meaning Reconstruction as the Core Psychological Mechanism, emphasizing both cognitive-existential and behavioral-occupational pathways; and (3) The Imperative for Existentially Integrated Postvention, which calls for a systems-based approach involving first responders, clinicians, and chaplains. Findings confirm that spirituality and religion are core determinants of bereavement trajectories. Effective postvention requires a comprehensive, systems-based approach that integrates spiritual assessment and meaning-centered therapies to support survivors. Future research should prioritize culturally diverse, spiritually integrated interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42207352What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.